Travel News

Health secretary candidate Becerra vows to ‘find a common cause’ as Republicans seek to paint him as extreme.

President Biden’s candidate for health secretary Xavier Becerra pledged Tuesday morning to work to “restore confidence in public health institutions” and “seek to find a common cause” with his critics, as Republicans sought to portray him as an unqualified liberal extremist. For the job.

Appearing before the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Work and Pensions, Mr. Becerra, the Attorney General of California, was toasted by Republicans who complained that they had no experience in the profession of health and targeted its support for the Affordable Care Act. and for abortion rights.

“Basically, you spoke out against pro-life,” Indiana Republican Senator Mike Braun told Becerra. He asked if Mr Becerra would pledge not to use taxpayer money for abortions, which is currently prohibited by federal law, except in cases where the mother’s life is at stake, or in the ‘incest or rape.

“I will commit to obeying the law,” replied Becerra, leaving himself some leeway should the law change.

Tuesday’s appearance was the first of two Senate confirmation hearings for Mr. Becerra; he is due to appear before the Senate Finance Committee on Wednesday. Despite the tough questions, Mr Becerra appears to be heading for confirmation in a Senate equally divided between Democrats and Republicans, but with Vice President Kamala Harris on hand to break the tie.

If confirmed, Mr Becerra will immediately face the daunting task of leading the department at a critical time, during a pandemic that has claimed half a million lives and has taken particularly devastating havoc on people from color. He would be the first Latino to serve as secretary of the federal Department of Health and Human Services.

Although Mr. Becerra, a former congressman, did not have direct experience as a medical professional, he took a keen interest in health policy in Washington and helped draft the Law on Health Care. affordable care. He has most recently been at the forefront of legal efforts to defend it, leading 20 states and the District of Columbia in a campaign to protect the law from dismantling Republicans.

Republicans and their allies in the conservative and anti-abortion movements have taken hold of the ACA’s defense of Becerra as well as his support for abortion rights.

The Conservative Action Project, an advocacy group, on Monday released a statement signed by dozens of Conservative leaders, including several former members of Congress, complaining that Mr Becerra had a “troubling record” on ” policies relating to the sanctity of life, human dignity and religious freedom. “

They specifically cited his vote against banning “late abortion” and accused him of using his role as attorney general “to tip the scales in favor of Planned Parenthood,” a group that advocates the law. to abortion. Asked by Utah Republican Senator Mitt Romney about the late abortion vote, Becerra noted his wife is an obstetrician-gynecologist and said he would “work to find common ground ” On the question. Mr. Romney was not impressed. “It looks like we’re not going to find common ground there,” he replied.

Democrats point to Mr Becerra’s experience as the head of one of the country’s largest justice departments through a particularly trying time, and his up-from-the-bootstraps biography. The son of Mexican immigrants, he studied at Stanford University both undergraduate and in law. He served 12 terms in Congress, representing Los Angeles, before becoming attorney general of his home state in 2017.

Travel News

Video: Biden defies critics of his coronavirus relief bill

new video loaded: Biden challenges critics of his coronavirus relief bill



Biden challenges critics of his coronavirus relief bill

President Biden on Friday called Republicans who complained that his $ 1.9 trillion economic relief package was too big to name the specific provisions they would prefer to remove from the bill.

We need Congress to pass my US bailout that deals with the immediate crisis, the emergency. Now the critics are saying my plan is too big, that it cost $ 1.9 trillion is too much. Let me ask them, what would they make me cut? What would they make me forget? Shouldn’t we invest 20 billion dollars to vaccinate the nation? Shouldn’t we invest $ 290 million to extend unemployment insurance to 11 million Americans? Shouldn’t we invest $ 50 billion to help small businesses stay open when tens of thousands of people have had to close permanently? If we don’t adopt the American Rescue Plan, 40 million Americans will lose their nutritional assistance thanks to a program we call SNAP, the old food stamp program. Are we not investing between $ 3 billion and $ 3 billion to prevent families from going hungry? I am grateful that the Senate and the House are moving quickly and I am ready to hear their ideas on how to improve the package and make it cheaper. I am open to it. But we need to clarify who is being helped and who is injured.

Recent episodes of United States and politics


Travel News

North Carolina Republicans censor Richard Burr for impeachment vote

The North Carolina Republican Party voted unanimously on Monday to censor Senator Richard M. Burr for voting to convict former President Donald J. Trump in his second impeachment trial.

The reprimand was the latest fallout for the seven Republicans who sided with the Democrats in an unsuccessful effort to convict Mr. Trump of inciting an insurgency on January 6, when a crowd of Trump supporters went wild. in the Capitol.

The vote for Mr Burr, 65, who will retire after three Senate terms, came as a surprise after he voted earlier against continuing the impeachment trial over a Republican challenge that the Senate had failed no jurisdiction to judge a former president. .

The North Carolina Republican Party said in a statement Monday that the decision to censor Mr. Burr was made by its central committee.

The party “agrees with the strong majority of Republicans in the US House of Representatives and Senate that the Democrat-led attempt to impeach a former president is outside the US Constitution. », Indicates the press release.

Mr Burr issued a brief statement in response saying it was a “really sad day” for Republicans in his state.

“The leaders of my party chose loyalty to one man over the fundamentals of the Republican Party and the founders of our great nation,” he said.

Mr Trump was acquitted on Saturday by a vote of 57 guilty to 43 not guilty who did not meet the two-thirds threshold for conviction. The result was no surprise as only six Republicans had joined with Democrats in clearing the way for the case to be heard by narrowly dismissing a constitutional objection.

Of the seven Republican senators who voted to convict, Mr Burr is not the only one to be reprimanded. The Louisiana Republican Party, for example, said after the impeachment vote it was “deeply disappointed” by the guilty vote of its home Senator Bill Cassidy.

Of the seven, only Mr. Burr and Sen. Patrick J. Toomey of Pennsylvania, who is also retiring, will no longer face voters. Mr. Toomey has been berated by several county-level Republican officials in his state in recent days.

Neither senator particularly criticized Mr. Trump while in office.

In 2019, Mr. Burr, then chairman of the Intelligence Committee, subpoenaed Donald Trump Jr.’s testimony as part of his work leading the only bipartisan congressional investigation into Russian election interference. The former president’s son responded by launching a political war against Mr Burr, putting him and the Intelligence Commission on their heels.

On the day of the vote in the impeachment trial, Mr Burr set out the reasons for his guilty vote, saying that the president “bears responsibility” for the events of January 6.

“The evidence is compelling that President Trump is guilty of instigating an insurgency against a branch of the same government and that the charge rises to the level of high crimes and misdemeanors,” he said. “Therefore, I voted to condemn.”

North Carolina Republican Party Chairman Michael Whatley issued a statement the same day calling Mr Burr’s vote a condemnation “contradictory.”

“The Republicans of North Carolina sent Senator Burr to the United States Senate to uphold the Constitution and his vote today to convict in a lawsuit he said unconstitutional is shocking and disappointing,” Mr. Whatley.

Mr Burr’s impeachment vote has fueled speculation that Mr Trump’s daughter-in-law Lara Trump will seek the seat of the North Carolina Senate that Mr Burr will leave after the 2022 election. Ms Trump, who is married to Eric Trump, grew up in the state, and launched out as a possible successor to Burr for months.

Ms Trump, 38, is a former personal trainer and television producer who grew up in Wilmington, North Carolina.A senior Republican official with knowledge of her plans said if the January 6 riot had soured Ms Trump’s desire to run for a position, she would. decide over the next few months to run as part of a coordinated Trump family return.

Travel News

Here are the seven Republicans who voted to condemn Trump.

Seven Republican senators voted on Saturday to convict former President Donald J. Trump in the most bipartisan vote for a presidential impeachment conviction in U.S. history. The margin was still 10 votes less than the two-thirds needed to find him guilty.

Who are the seven senators? Only one – Lisa Murkowski – is re-elected next year and she survived attacks from the front right. Two are retiring and three won new terms in November, so they won’t face voters until 2026.

Mr. Burr, 65, a senator since 2005, is not seeking re-election in 2022. Although he held Mr. Trump immediately responsible for the riot on Capitol Hill, he had voted against continuing the impeachment trial, and his decision to condemn came as a surprise.

“As I said on January 6, the president bears responsibility for these tragic events,” Burr said in a statement on Saturday. “The evidence is compelling that President Trump is guilty of inciting an insurgency against a branch of the same government and that the prosecution rises to the level of high crimes and misdemeanors. Therefore, I voted to condemn.

Mr. Cassidy, 63, senator since 2015, has just been re-elected. A few weeks ago, he voted against continuing the trial, but said he was persuaded by impeachment officials in the House.

“Our Constitution and our country are more important than anyone,” Mr. Cassidy said. “I voted to condemn President Trump because he is guilty.”

Ms Collins, 68, a senator since 1997, has just been re-elected for a fifth term. She has long criticized Mr. Trump’s actions, extending to the Capitol Riot.

“This attack was not a spontaneous outbreak of violence,” Collins told the Senate after the vote. “Rather, it was the culmination of a constant stream of provocations from President Trump aimed at overturning the results of the presidential election.”

Ms Murkowski, 63, a senator since 2002, is re-elected in 2022. She appealed for Democrats and Independents and won a written campaign in 2010 after losing the Republican primary. She harshly criticized Mr. Trump’s actions before and during the rampage on Capitol Hill, calling his conduct “illegal.”

“It’s not about me, my life and my job,” Murkowski told a Politico reporter who asked her about the political risk she took with her vote. “This is really what we stand for. If I can’t say what I think our president should represent, then why should I ask the Alaskans to support me?

Mr. Romney, 73, a senator since 2019, is the only Republican to vote to convict Mr. Trump in his first impeachment trial. A former presidential candidate, he made it clear after the attack on Capitol Hill that he held Mr. Trump responsible.

“President Trump attempted to corrupt the election by pressuring Georgia’s secretary of state to falsify election results in his state,” Romney said in a statement on Saturday. “President Trump instigated an insurgency against Congress by using the power of his office to summon his supporters to Washington on January 6 and urging them to march on Capitol Hill during the electoral count. He did so despite the obvious and well-known threats of violence that day. President Trump also violated his oath by failing to protect the Capitol, the Vice President, and others on Capitol Hill. Each of these conclusions compels me to support the conviction.

Mr. Sasse, 48, senator since 2015, has just been re-elected. He has frequently criticized Mr. Trump and has indicated he is prepared to condemn the former president.

“On election night in 2014, I promised the Nebraskans to always vote my conscience even if it was against the partisan trend,” Sasse said in a statement. “During my first speech here in the Senate in November 2015, I promised to speak up when a president – even of my own party – exceeds his powers. I cannot go back on my word, and Congress cannot lower our standards on such a serious issue, just because it is politically expedient.

Mr. Toomey, 59, a senator since 2011, is not seeking re-election in 2022. He had denounced Mr. Trump’s conduct; in a statement on Saturday, he said he decided at trial that the former president deserved to be found guilty.

“I listened to the arguments from both sides,” Mr. Toomey said, “and I thought the arguments for sentencing were much stronger.

Travel News

House managers base their case against Trump, but most Republicans are uninfluenced

With Republican positions hardening and President Biden’s agenda procedurally slowed, Democratic senators began to signal that they had seen enough, too, and members of both sides were rallying around a plan to end quickly to trial with a vote on guilt or innocence. from Saturday.

Confident of acquittal, Mr Trump was spotted on a golf course in Florida as his defense team prepared a truncated presentation to be offered on Friday rather than taking the full two days for arguments permitted by the rules of the trial.

After a highly controversial preliminary appearance earlier this week, lawyers for Mr. Trump planned to argue that he was being prosecuted for partisan enmity, had never openly called for violence and was not responsible for the actions of his supporters .

Republican senators have been reluctant to defend Mr. Trump’s actions, instead explaining their likely acquittal votes by arguing that it is unconstitutional and unwise to bring a former president to justice and by accusing Democrats who sometimes use fiery speech themselves to hold a political enemy to a double. Standard. The Senate on Tuesday rejected the constitutionality argument by 56 to 44, allowing the trial to continue, but Republicans said they were under no obligation to accept the judgment.

“My point of view is unchanged as to whether or not we have the power to do it, and I am certainly not bound by the fact that 56 people think we are doing it,” said Senator Roy Blunt, Republican of the Missouri. “I can vote, and I think you can’t remove a former president. And if the former president did things that were illegal, there is a process to follow for that.

Florida Republican Senator Marco Rubio offered similar reasoning. “What happened on January 6 – I said this when it started – was unpatriotic, anti-American, traitor, an unacceptable crime,” he said. “The fundamental question for me, and I don’t know for everyone, is whether an impeachment trial is appropriate for someone who is no longer in office. I do not believe this is the case.

Travel News

House Republicans announce 47 Democrats they hope to overthrow

WASHINGTON – The House Republicans campaign wing on Wednesday revealed the list of 47 House Democrats it will target in the 2022 midterm election, the results of which will likely be determined in large part by the president’s popularity Biden.

The Congressional Republican National Committee roster includes 25 Democrats who were first elected in the 2018 Wave of Democrats election and six incumbents who represent districts that voted for former President Donald J. Trump in November. It includes a wide range of moderate Democrats, including Representatives Abigail Spanberger of Virginia and Conor Lamb of Pennsylvania, who have publicly clashed with the more liberal wing of the party in recent months.

The target list comes three months after House Republicans topped pre-election polls and reversed 15 seats held by Democrats in last year’s election. The party out of power generally does well in midterm elections: since World War II, the president’s party has lost an average of 27 House seats in the midterm elections.

The 2022 elections have the potential to carry a dynamic unseen in previous midterm contests – a referendum on the actions of a former president. Democrats have already signaled their intention to bind House Republicans to the Jan.6 riot on Capitol Hill that was instigated by Mr. Trump.

Representative Tom Emmer of Minnesota, president of the NRCC, strongly condemned the rioters during a video conference Wednesday with reporters, but also praised Mr. Trump’s campaign assistance. He said his committee would continue to embrace the former president and maintain its policy of not taking sides in primaries – even to help outgoing members who voted to impeach the former president.

“President Trump and his administration have implemented incredible policies for this country, haven’t they?” Said Mr. Emmer. “Their economic policies, their energy policies, putting Americans and America first, this policy, it was all good. It brought a ton of new voters into our party. I think Republicans need to celebrate these policies, I think we need to keep embracing them.

The Republicans roster is speculative, considering it will be months before states can begin drawing new district lines in Congress. The Census Bureau is already behind schedule in delivering redistribution and redistribution data to states, delaying at least until late summer a process that typically begins in February or March.

The delay in census data has left Congressional campaign committees of both parties in limbo as they seek to recruit candidates for the suspected districts. Sun Belt states like Texas and Florida are expected to add several new districts, while northern states including Illinois, Ohio and New York are likely to lose at least one seat each.

Mr Emmer said Republicans would “gain by redistribution” and “maximize our opportunities.”

“What I am talking about is fair and transparent, and that the districts make sense and that they do not only reflect the geography of the state and that they are a fair representation of the demographics of the state,” a- he declared.

Seven House Democrats who represent the districts Mr. Trump elected in November are on the NRCC list: Representatives Cindy Axne of Iowa, Cheri Bustos of Illinois, Matt Cartwright of Pennsylvania, Jared Golden of Maine, Elissa Slotkin from Michigan, Andy Kim from New Jersey and Ron Kind from Wisconsin.

Ms Bustos, who led the House Democrats’ election campaign in 2020, had victory margins that fell from 24 percentage points in 2018 to four points in 2020. But with Illinois certain of losing at least one seat, her gerrymandered district, which winds around to include Democratic-leaning sections of Peoria and Rockford as well as the Illinois part of the Quad Cities, will change before it faces voters again.

The NRCC also believes that a handful of Democrats who have underperformed Mr Biden could be vulnerable to better funded challengers. Those Democrats include Representatives Katie Porter and Mike Levin of California, both of whom received far less support than Mr Biden in November.

Travel News

Wyoming Republicans censor Liz Cheney for impeachment vote

The Wyoming Republican Party voted Saturday to censor Rep. Liz Cheney, the third Republican in the House, for her vote last month to impeach Donald J. Trump, making her the last lawmaker to be publicly berated for breaking with the former president.

“My vote to impeach was constrained by the oath I took to the Constitution,” Cheney said in a statement on Saturday. “The citizens of Wyoming know that this oath does not bend or yield to politics or partisanship.

The censorship, which is largely symbolic, came days after Ms. Cheney overcame an effort by Trump loyalists in the House to strip her of her leadership position after she voted to accuse Mr. Trump of “inciting to the insurrection ”for his role in exhorting a crowd that stormed the Capitol. The House Republican conference vote, 145 to 61, was a victory for Ms Cheney, who also retained the support of Representative Kevin McCarthy of California, the chamber’s top Republican.

The bitter debate over Ms. Cheney underscored deep divisions within the Republican Party over Mr. Trump, and state-level Republicans across the country have censored prominent politicians who have criticized Mr. Trump. In Arizona, the party censored Governor Doug Ducey, former Senator Jeff Flake and Cindy McCain, the widow of former Senator John McCain. In Nebraska, Senator Ben Sasse faces censorship from his state’s party, criticizing the party in a video Friday and denouncing what he called the “cult” of Mr. Trump’s organization.

Ms Cheney’s censure resolution also called on her to “quit immediately” and repay donations the party made to her 2020 campaign, according to a copy obtained by Forbes.

Travel News

Exiled from committees, Greene says she is ‘liberated’ to push Republicans to the right

WASHINGTON – A day after the House voted to ban her from congressional committees, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene sent a provocative message to both parties on Friday, warning that the punishment had only “freed” her to pressure Republicans more to the right and insist on their allegiance to former President Donald J. Trump.

Speaking at a large press conference outside on Capitol Hill, Ms Greene, a first-term Republican from Georgia, said that although the House vote on Thursday to remove her from two panels had deprived her constituents of an important voice in the Congress, it had personally benefited him.

“In the future, I have been released,” Ms. Greene said, adding, “I will hold the Republican Party accountable and push it to the right.”

Ms Greene’s comments and her determination to stay in the spotlight dashed any hope Republican House leaders had that she would calm down in the name of party unity after her reprimand. And it underscored the influence the former president, who praised Ms Greene, still has on some of the loudest voices in Congress.

“The party is his,” Ms. Greene said. “It doesn’t belong to anyone else.”

11 Republicans joined all House Democrats on Thursday in voting to remove Ms Greene from the committee, after a stream of social media posts surfaced in which she endorsed the dangerous conspiracy theories and political violence, including the execution of leading Democrats.

Representative Kevin McCarthy, the House minority leader, had refused to discipline her, forcing an uncomfortable vote for House Republicans, who had to choose between defending Ms Greene or alienating their constituents who subscribed to similar beliefs.

The episode revealed deep divisions among Republicans over how to move forward as a party. In the days leading up to the vote on Ms Greene, Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, Washington’s most powerful Republican, had denounced her statements, which he called “wacky lies”, claiming that these conspiracy theories were a “Cancer” for the party. .

Several other high-profile Republican senators had joined him in censoring Ms Greene and saying that she could not become the face of the party.

Ms Greene has shown varying degrees of contrition for her past adoption of QAnon, the pro-Trump conspiratorial movement, and for her previous comments, which included endorsing the murder of President Nancy Pelosi, incorrectly suggesting that several mass shootings have taken place. been secretly perpetrated by the government. actors and spread a range of anti-Semitic and Islamophobic conspiracy theories.

In moving remarks in the House, Ms Greene expressed regret on Thursday for some of her earlier comments and disowned many of her more outlandish and disgusting statements. She admitted, for example, that the September 11, 2001 attacks had taken place, but did not apologize, saying that she was “allowed to believe things that were not true”.

When asked by a CNN reporter on Friday to apologize for some of her more offensive comments before being elected to Congress, Ms. Greene first asked the reporter to apologize for the network’s coverage of the investigation. Trump-Russia.

But when another reporter pressed her, she offered her first unequivocal apology so far.

“Of course, I’m sorry I said all of these things that are bad and offensive,” Ms. Greene said. “And I mean it sincerely, and I’m happy to say it. I think it’s good to say that we did something wrong.

But hours before, she had sounded a different tone.

“I woke up early this morning literally laughing thinking what the dumb Democrats are (+11) to give someone like me some free time,” she wrote on twitter. “In this tyrannical Democratic government, the conservative Republicans do not have a say in the committees anyway. Oh, it’s gonna be fun! “

Glenn thrush contribution to reports.

Travel News

House Exile Marjorie Taylor Greene in billboards, as Republicans rally around her

Still, the episode revealed deep divisions among Republicans over how to move forward as a party. In the days leading up to the vote on Ms Greene, Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, Washington’s most powerful Republican, denounced her statements, which he called “wacky lies,” claiming the conspiracy theories were a “Cancer” party. Several other high-profile Republican senators had joined him in denouncing Ms Greene and saying that she could not become the face of the party.

In an effort to warn Democrats of the move, House Republicans brought forward their own proposal to remove Minnesota Democrat Representative Ilhan Omar from the Foreign Affairs Committee, citing comments she made, including that Israel had “hypnotized the world” by ignoring their “evil deeds.” Ms Omar has publicly apologized for the comments, which led to accusations of anti-Semitism.

“If this is the new standard, I look forward to continuing to enforce the standard,” McCarthy said, adding that Republicans have a “long list” of Democrats they would like to remove from their committees.

On Wednesday, after Democrats announced they were going to push to reprimand Ms Greene, Mr McCarthy released a lengthy, tortured statement condemning her comments and saying they had no place among House Republicans, but arguing that she didn’t deserve to be punished. for them. He went further on Wednesday night after the controversial Republicans meeting, which lasted for hours, telling reporters Ms Greene had privately apologized for her previous remarks and suggesting it was time to move on.

“She said she didn’t know anything about lasers or all the different things that have been talked about about her,” Mr McCarthy said, apparently referring to a Facebook post Ms Greene wrote in 2018 suggesting that Devastating California wildfires were caused by a space laser controlled by a prominent Jewish banking family with ties to powerful Democrats.

“If we are now going to start judging what other members said before they became members of Congress, I think it will be a difficult time for Democrats to put someone on the committee,” he added.

According to Eleanor Neff Powell, professor of political science at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, dismissal of committees is generally reserved for lawmakers who are the subject of criminal indictments or investigations or who have otherwise broken with their party. particularly blatantly.

Travel News

Biden’s policies are popular. What does this mean for Republicans?

The American public has given President Biden favorable reviews since taking office last month, and the policies he is rushing to put in place appear widely popular, polls show.

And notably, as he signs a wave of executive action and pushes a major $ 1.9 trillion coronavirus relief bill, Mr Biden faces muted opposition from Republicans until ‘now – a reflection of the party’s weakened position as it juggles two increasingly divided factions.

“I think the Republicans found Biden to be a lot more progressive than they thought he was, but I think we’re too busy trying to kill ourselves to really focus on it,” said Sarah Chamberlain, president of the Republican Main Street Partnership, a group of centrist Republicans that includes more than 60 members of the House and Senate.

This week, the House GOP caucus met to discuss the fate of two lawmakers representing opposite ends of the party’s identity: Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia and Rep. Liz Cheney of Wyoming, Republican No.3 from the room. Ms Greene is one of the chamber’s most ardent loyalists to former President Donald J. Trump, while Ms Cheney lobbies to dissociate the party from her brand of populism.

The result of Wednesday’s meeting was something of a deadlock, with Republican leaders allowing Ms Greene to retain her powers on the committee despite a history of offensive and conspiratorial statements, and Ms Cheney comfortably retaining her leading position against a mutiny by Trump’s allies. Thursday was to bring another moment of truth for Republicans in the House, with the entire body voting on whether to remove Ms. Greene from her committee positions.

This intra-party divide gives Mr. Biden “the upper hand” as he pushes his legislative agenda forward, said Doug Schwartz, director of polls at the University of Quinnipiac, who released a nationwide poll on Wednesday. “He advocates policies that have strong public support so that Republicans are more in a defensive posture because they oppose popular policies,” Schwartz said.

Public dissatisfaction with the state of affairs in the United States remains high: about seven in ten say they are unhappy with the way things are going, according to the Quinnipiac poll. But optimism is on the rise and many are pinning their hopes on the new president. When asked about the next four years under Mr. Biden’s leadership, 61% of Americans described themselves as optimistic.

In a Monmouth University poll released last week, 42% of Americans said the country was heading in the right direction – far less than half, but still more than in any Monmouth poll dating back to 2013 .

The Quinnipiac Inquiry found that more than two-thirds of Americans support Mr Biden’s coronavirus relief program, with a large majority also supporting certain key elements – including a permanent increase in a minimum wage of $ 15 and a series of $ 1,400 stimulus checks to individuals. On the issue of stimulus payments, even 64% of Republicans backed them.

On a series of other Biden policies, the poll found broad support: joining the Paris climate accord, paving the way for citizenship for undocumented immigrants, and ending Mr. Trump’s ban. to travel from certain predominantly Muslim countries.

It should be mentioned that pollsters across the country underestimated support for Mr. Trump in November for the second time in a row; Until the survey’s researchers complete a full post-mortem analysis of the 2020 poll, it will be impossible to rule out the possibility that some polls are still missing some of its supporters.

Yet “generally smart Republicans try to choose their battles,” said Robert Cahaly, a Republican pollster in Georgia who has worked with candidates both in the populist wing of the party and in its establishment.

Mr. Biden, for his part, will seek to capitalize on the Republicans’ compromised position. “Ultimately America wanted a more empathetic president, but people don’t want a president who seems weak,” Mr. Cahaly said.

But he and other Republican strategists have warned that if Mr Biden moves too hastily on legislation seen as left-wing, he could face a backlash from some of the disgruntled Republicans who backed him in November. Ms Chamberlain said if Mr Biden’s environmental policies were seen to hurt the economy, he could find himself in a hole. “I think you let them pass laws left and right and then you expose them for what they are,” Ms. Chamberlain said of her suggested strategy for Republicans.

Americans are not holding their breath for a new dawn of bipartisanship. Only 21% of Monmouth poll respondents said they were very confident Mr Biden would be able to persuade Washington lawmakers to work more together. Another 39 percent were somewhat confident.

Although Mr Biden receives favorable job evaluations overall, 16% of Americans in the Monmouth and Quinnipiac polls said they had not made a decision. Many of those people are one-time GOP voters who have lost faith in the party led by Mr. Trump and are waiting to see how Mr. Biden governs, longtime Republican pollster Whit Ayres said.

“Basically the approval numbers on Biden are Trump’s disapproval,” Ayres said. “But the disapproval numbers on Biden are lower than the approval numbers on Trump – suggesting some people are waiting to see what he’s doing.”

And those who stay behind are proven to give him the benefit of the doubt. In an Associated Press / NORC poll released Thursday, in which respondents were pressured to give an answer, his approval rose to 61%. Thirty-eight percent disagreed.

The opinions of the Republican Party, on the other hand, are much darker.

In the Quinnipiac poll, 64% of Americans said the GOP was going in the wrong direction, including an overwhelming 70% independent and 30% Republican supporters, according to the Quinnipiac poll.

The party’s base is now heavily focused on Trump supporters. “The Trump base is so important as a part of the party because a lot of my types of Republicans have left the party,” said Ms. Chamberlain, the leader of the centrist group. “But they want to come back to the party.”

These staunch pro-Trump Republicans express deep frustration with their representation in Washington. Most GOP voters continue to believe the November vote was rigged, echoing Mr. Trump’s false claims, and many are angered that lawmakers in Washington were not able to keep him in power.

Partly as a result, only 50% of Republicans said they were satisfied with GOP lawmakers in Washington, according to the Quinnipiac poll. That’s down from 83% among Republican voters nationwide in a Quinnipiac survey a year ago.

“Two people can both look at the same house and not like it, but for different reasons,” Mr. Cahaly said. “There is just one element of Republicans who want their old party back and hate the new populism. Then there are Republicans who like the idea of ​​it being a workers’ party and want old Republicans to become Democrats. This fight will take place in the primaries, in the town halls. This party is in a small civil war. “