Travel News

Video: Legislators’ debate on removing Representative Greene from committees

new video loaded: Legislators’ debate on removing Representative Greene from committees



Legislators’ debate on removing Representative Greene from committees

The House Rules Committee on Wednesday debated a resolution that would remove Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene from her duties on the committee due to the Republican freshman’s past support for conspiracy theories and violence against Democratic politicians.

“Removing Congresswoman Greene is the right thing to do now, and I regret that we have to do it at the Rules Committee rather than at the leadership level of the party. Nevertheless, we will do it. And let’s be clear: this is not a debate about a difference in politics or even ideology. It’s about what she said. “I want to be very clear at the outset that I find Congressman Greene’s comments deeply offensive. Using vile anti-Semitic slurs, degrading those with special needs, endorsing violence against political leaders, and further victimizing those who have suffered unimaginable trauma is absolutely disgusting, and it does not suit any member of Congress. However, the actions taken today by the majority raise questions that have nothing to do with MP Greene but concern the institution as a whole, which is why I believe that this hearing is premature and should instead be judged by the ethics committee. “Sir. Mr. President, that is not – we cannot hide behind process arguments, which are basically not accurate anyway.” The statements that I have seen publicly have been made before whether Ms. Greene was running for or before being sworn in as a member of Congress on January 3. Most, if not all, statements were made in 2018 and 2019 when Ms. Greene was an ordinary citizen of the United States. timing of the statements does not make them correct, but the timing of the statements puts them outside the competence of the Ethics Committee. “

Recent episodes of United States and politics


Travel News

How the governor of Iowa went from removing mask warrants to ordering itself

The country registers on average more than 158,000 new cases per day, the highest to date of the pandemic; more than 76,000 people are hospitalized with the virus across the country, far more than previous peaks; and deaths are on the rise again. President Trump has largely ceded the response to the pandemic to governors, and the states with the fastest growing virus per capita – North Dakota, South Dakota, and Iowa – are all led by Republicans.

In Iowa, Ms Reynolds had faced pressure for months – from mayors, doctors, nurses and farmers, who feared the spike in cases could lead to chain disruptions. food supply in a state where agriculture and meat processing are major industries.

Like most other governors, Ms Reynolds closed businesses in the spring, but resisted issuing a stay-at-home order and did not need masks when communities reopened.

Today, as the virus sweeps across the Midwest, more than 4,100 people test positive for the virus in Iowa every day on average, an 86% increase in the past two weeks. Hospitalizations have doubled over the same period and coronavirus patients now account for one in four hospitalizations in the state.

The crisis led to significant movement last week, when the Iowa State Board of Health, whose members were appointed by Ms Reynolds, urged her to issue a mask warrant. The board vote was itself a sign of how the growing toll of the virus has forced people to change their thinking. Council members, most of whom are Republicans and work in the healthcare industry, had discussed face covers in previous meetings but were not in favor of a term.

At the most recent meeting, however, they voted 7-2 to encourage the governor to issue the order.

“Circumstances have changed enough in Iowa,” said Chris Atchison, vice chairman of the board, who said he could only recall one other instance in which members made a recommendation. to the governor during his more than three years on the board.

Travel News

Faced with election day anxiety? Consider removing some apps and taking a walk.

Owen Keehnen, writer and historian in Chicago, falls asleep because of the election. About five times a week for the past few months, he has woken up around 3 a.m. in a panic, he said.

“As the election approaches, I feel tremendous anxiety,” said Mr. Keehnen, 60. “So much seems to depend on the election when it comes to rights down the line and everything. It really took a toll on my sleep.

Mr Keehnen is not alone in dealing with the stress of this electoral cycle, a reality only amplified by the coronavirus pandemic.

About two-thirds of Americans in 2017 said their worry about the country’s future was a major source of their stress over money and work, according to a report released that year by the American Psychological Association titled “Stress in America: The State of Our Nation.”

The survey found that a majority of people from both political parties were stressed by what she described as the “current social divide,” but those numbers were higher for Democrats at 73%, compared to Republicans at 56%. and the independents at 59%, he said. .

Allison Eden, associate professor of communications at Michigan State University, suggested a series of steps to alleviate the stress and anxiety the day can bring, including removing social media apps like Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok. from your phone. Making them a little more difficult can help.

“You would have to access it through a website or device not readily available,” she said of the apps. “But if you remove the logo from your phone, you’re less likely to click on it.” Eliminating notifications can also help alleviate stress, she said.