Travel News

What to know about relief from Covid-19 in California


Governor Gavin Newsom signed a $ 7.6 billion stimulus package last week that will send $ 600 in payments to an estimated 5.7 million low-income Californians. The relief package was “desperately needed by millions upon millions of Californians,” Newsom said at a press conference last week. “Those who were left behind in the federal stimulus, California won’t leave you behind.”

The move came as Mr Newsom came under fire from critics who blame his mismanagement of pandemic restrictions for the plight of struggling businesses. The state’s small business owners are participating in the governor’s recall efforts. It remains to be seen how exactly the most recent relief package might help or hinder recall efforts – nearly all of the signatures needed to move the process forward have been collected, but have yet to be verified.

[Read more about how the recall works and what’s ahead.]

Last week, the state passed the grim milestone of 50,000 deaths – more than any other state, but far behind other states in per capita deaths. There have been an average of 5,761 cases per day over the past week, a decrease of 46% from the average two weeks earlier. And while the drop from all-time highs is a good sign, experts warn that recent case drops are not a reason to lift restrictions.

Nonetheless, several counties in California have resumed outdoor activities, including dining and contact sports, while schools in many areas remain closed. Last week, a report also highlighted the impact of the pandemic on California’s “creative economy,” showing that from February to December of last year, the state lost 175,000 jobs in industries such as as entertainment, media, architecture, fashion, etc.

The state’s relief program aims to help both small businesses and low-income residents affected by the pandemic.

“This plan represents a way to mitigate the human and economic blows of Covid. In addition, it lays the economic foundation for the recovery, ”said President of the State, Anthony Rendon. Here is what you can expect from the invoice.

People who claimed the California Earned Income Tax Credit – which applies to those earning less than $ 30,000 per year – on their 2020 tax return will be eligible.

Separately, taxpayers who use individual tax identification numbers and earn less than $ 75,000 after deductions will also be eligible for $ 600. (Those who use ID numbers are typically undocumented immigrants, who were not eligible for federal stimulus payments.) In total, households that use individual IDs and claim the state’s earned income credit will receive $ 1,200.

Other low-income Californians enrolled in the CalWORKS program are also eligible for a one-time grant of $ 600.

[Read more about the federal coronavirus aid bill, which passed the House over the weekend and is headed to the Senate.]

Those who are eligible through the state’s EIC or as filers using individual tax identification numbers can expect to receive their payment approximately four to five weeks after filing their tax returns. (Those who were eligible for the credit but didn’t apply it to their taxes can change their returns.)

For those participating in the CalWORKS program, the state said grant payments are expected in mid-April.

This relief program also provides funding of $ 2.1 billion for grants to small businesses. It includes fee waivers for bars, restaurants, hair salons and other hard-hit businesses.

In addition, other parts of the package include resources for essential child care and financial assistance for community college students. Federal funds will help provide stipends of $ 525 per child enrolled in all publicly funded child care and preschool services. For low-income community college students, the program includes emergency financial assistance of $ 100 million as well as an additional $ 20 million to support efforts to re-engage students who may have left colleges due to hardship. of the pandemic.

(This article is part of California today newsletter. Register now to have it delivered to your inbox.)

  • President Biden has vowed to create a more humane approach to immigration. But thousands of children who crossed the southwest border alone are confined in government shelters, rather than sent to their families. [The New York Times]

  • Tired of being locked inside during the pandemic, Vicha Ratanapakdee, a Thai immigrant who lived in San Francisco, was impatient for his regular morning walk. Then a brutal assault ended his life and sparked an uproar against anti-Asian racism. [The New York Times]

Learn about the complex and deeply moving outpouring of pain in response to attacks on Asian-American and Pacific Islander communities. [The New York Times]

  • See an illustration of how opening windows could help schools reopen. [The New York Times]

  • Nearly 1.2 million teachers and other essential workers will be eligible for vaccines in Los Angeles County starting today. [The Los Angeles Times]

  • High school students face a range of challenges, like isolation and pandemic exhaustion, and they are asking for university financial aid at lower rates. [LAist]

  • Supporters say counties like Kern lack of infrastructure to reach vulnerable agricultural workers for vaccination. [The Bakersfield Californian]

  • Californians speak more than 200 languagesSo it is difficult to spread good information that all residents of the state can understand. [The Sacramento Bee]

  • He is a 13-year-old recreational guerrilla who builds swings around Oakland – and he’s not afraid of breaking the rules. [Oaklandside]

  • “We knew that day was coming.” Fans bid farewell to beloved Ruby outpost, in Huntington Beach. [The Orange County Register]

  • A pair of skiers became the first to complete a daring hike in the Half Dome in Yosemite National Park. [The San Francisco Chronicle]

Travel News

Video: House adopts $ 1.9 trillion coronavirus relief plan

“Since the emergence of the coronavirus, our nation has been in a state of perpetual mourning. The number of Americans killed by this pandemic is almost equal to one death per minute, every minute for a year. Every corner of society has been touched. “We have acted quickly, Madam President, but we have also acted deliberately, guided by the fact that the American people need us to act urgently.” “Throughout this process, Republicans have been completely left out. I sit on the Committee on Energy and Trade. I sit on the budget committee. I sit on the Rules Committee. Throughout the increases in each of these committees, Republicans have offered sincere amendments to improve the bill for the American people, while only two of the 245 proposed Republican amendments have passed, the rule before us today. hui deleted the only amendment adopted by roll call. vote. “” The tentacles of this pandemic have infiltrated all facets of the life of our communities. The point of this rescue program is that it understands these complexities and addresses these many needs. For example, since the beginning of the pandemic, we have seen more and more reports of abuse against women and children, so this bill helps fund shelters and shelters. We need this package to end the suffering of the nation. Let’s pass this bill. “Don’t call it a bailout bill. Don’t call it a bailout bill. If you’re a friend of the speaker, you do pretty well with it. this bill, but for the American people it is a loser. “Almost every one of the 592 pages of this bill includes a liberal pre-pandemic chimera.” “The American people need to know that their government is there for them. And as President Biden said, help is on the way.” “Raising the average wage is a financial necessity for our families, a tremendous stimulus for our economy and a moral imperative for our country. In this light, therefore, it is inevitable for all of us that the minimum wage of $ 15 is reached, although it is inconceivable for some, it is inevitable for us. This vote, the yeas are 219, the nays are 212. The bill is passed without objection and the reconsideration motion is laid on the table.


Travel News

Video: Biden defies critics of his coronavirus relief bill

new video loaded: Biden challenges critics of his coronavirus relief bill



Biden challenges critics of his coronavirus relief bill

President Biden on Friday called Republicans who complained that his $ 1.9 trillion economic relief package was too big to name the specific provisions they would prefer to remove from the bill.

We need Congress to pass my US bailout that deals with the immediate crisis, the emergency. Now the critics are saying my plan is too big, that it cost $ 1.9 trillion is too much. Let me ask them, what would they make me cut? What would they make me forget? Shouldn’t we invest 20 billion dollars to vaccinate the nation? Shouldn’t we invest $ 290 million to extend unemployment insurance to 11 million Americans? Shouldn’t we invest $ 50 billion to help small businesses stay open when tens of thousands of people have had to close permanently? If we don’t adopt the American Rescue Plan, 40 million Americans will lose their nutritional assistance thanks to a program we call SNAP, the old food stamp program. Are we not investing between $ 3 billion and $ 3 billion to prevent families from going hungry? I am grateful that the Senate and the House are moving quickly and I am ready to hear their ideas on how to improve the package and make it cheaper. I am open to it. But we need to clarify who is being helped and who is injured.

Recent episodes of United States and politics


Travel News

Inside a nursing home after the vaccine: joy, relief and a game night

A nursing home where vaccinations have ended offers a glimpse of what the other side of the pandemic could look like.

WHEELING, W.Va. – The day had finally arrived.

After nearly a year of confinement for residents of Good Shepherd Nursing Home – eating meals in their rooms, playing bingo on their televisions and isolating themselves almost entirely from the outside world – their coronavirus vaccinations were over and the hallways were slowly starting to wake up. .

In a first tentative glimpse at what the other side of the pandemic might look like, Betty Lou Leech, 97, arrived in the dining room early, a mask on her face, her hair freshly curled.

“I’m too excited to eat,” she said, sitting down again at her favorite table.

It has been a miserable year for American retirement homes. More than 163,000 residents and employees of long-term care facilities have died from the coronavirus, about one-third of all deaths from the virus in the United States. Infections have swept through some 31,000 facilities and nearly all have had to shut down in one way or another.

For more than a million nursing home residents, the lockdowns themselves have been devastating. Cut off from family and largely confined to their rooms, many residents lost weight and saw their ailments worsen. Some have become more and more confused. Others fell into depression and despair.

“When it comes to people’s happiness – everyone’s happiness – these social bonds are at the highest level, if not the most important thing,” said Robyn Grant, of the National Consumer Voice for Quality Long-Term Care. , who said even small steps, like being able to spend more time with other residents, “would be huge.”

West Virginia became one of the first states to finish giving two doses of vaccines to the thousands of people inside its nursing homes, so Good Shepherd, a 192-bed Catholic home in Wheeling, has was among the first establishments in the country to begin. tiptoe back to normal last week.

The first day back was full of ordinary moments: chatting over coffee, wartime auctions at an afternoon auction, dice game. But after a year of loss, loneliness and turmoil, the sheer banality of it all brought joy and relief.

In the dining room, almost empty since March, tables were set with formal white linens. Red and pink garlands adorned each table. Ms. Leech greeted her friends – “Hey Peg!” – and joking with the dining room staff. When her table mate Sherry Roeser refused the sugar in her tea, Ms. Leech joked, “She’s pretty sweet!

But amid the clanging of silverware and the calming sound of jazz, the losses of the past year were felt at every table where someone was missing.

Good Shepherd closed in March, even before the virus was discovered in West Virginia. The residents went without visits with their relatives, trips to the cinema, even in the open air.

“I felt really lost,” said Joseph Wilhelm, 89, a retired priest who said he found it difficult to concentrate on prayer.

On two occasions, the nursing home attempted to relax restrictions, only to shut down again.

Sally Joseph, 85, had tears in her eyes as she spoke of being separated from her children and grandchildren. At Christmas, she looked out the window and waved to her grandson, who visited the parking lot. “It’s the hardest thing,” she said. “But then when I cry and feel sorry for myself, I think, ‘Everyone in the world has the same problem as me.’

In November, an epidemic ravaged the third floor of Good Shepherd.

Five residents died. Among them was Michael Strada, a frequent traveler who had visited 50 countries. John Strahl, who loved to fish and hunt. Marjorie Lekanidis, who was delighted to spend time with her dog. Ann Martin, who adored her church, her granddaughters and didn’t drive anywhere in particular.

Fifteen others fell ill during the outbreak, including Ms Leech. After recovering in the Covid-19 ward at the nursing home, she was feeling better, she said, and eager to return to a version of normal life, no matter how simple.

“You just have to see the people here,” she said.

On the menu for the first day back, cheese burgers and potato soup, unveiled with a slew of silver dishes.

“You look pretty good today,” Ms Leech shouted across the room to Ruth Nicholson, 79, who wore a blazer, jewelry and a headband – each in a different bold color.

“Oh, thank you dear,” Ms. Nicholson replied. “I am always dressed when we come here.”

“And you know,” she said, “I missed this place.”

Even with the vaccinations over, not everything is back to normal. Residents are allowed to socialize together again, but they are also encouraged to continue wearing masks. They are seated several meters from each other. And most of the relatives and friends still cannot come to visit.

The permanent precautions allow us to better understand the complications of reopening, well beyond retirement homes. About 20 percent of the people at Good Shepherd – mostly staff and a few residents – refused to be vaccinated, reflecting a reluctance that has been seen across the country. Cases in the surrounding county remain high. More research is needed to understand whether vaccinated people could still transmit the virus.

So it was in a socially remote labyrinth of wheelchairs that a “penny auction” took place – the first in over a year.

A crowd gathered and Vickie Henderson, an assistant business manager who had spent several hours shopping at Walmart and various dollar stores, took on the role of auctioneer as residents bid on items like cookies and a multicolored handmade quilt. “Do I hear a dime?” she cried, shaping a scarf and waving a pair of sunglasses. “Can I hear two?”

At one point, a bidding war broke out over a Snoopy stuffed animal that was playing the “Peanuts” theme song.

When Ms Leech’s moment came, she spent all of her allotted money – everyone got 10 cents – on a giant jar of cheese puffs.

In the hustle and bustle of the day there were moments of stillness.

In the hall of a stained-glass chapel, Frank and Phyllis Ellis were enjoying a quiet reunion.

Mr Ellis, 91, lives at the couple’s home in Wheeling, while Ms Ellis, 87, remains at Good Shepherd. As government rules have changed, the nursing home has begun to allow a small number of residents who seem most in need to have limited visits with their loved ones.

In 69 years of marriage, the Ellises said, they’ve never spent as much time apart as they did last year.

“We saw each other on Facebook,” Ms. Ellis said.

“FaceTime,” her husband corrected her gently.

The Ellis’ visits are short and sterile: she in a surgical mask, he in a gown, N95 mask and plastic mask. He doesn’t even think about kissing her, he said, for fear of endangering her.

When their time together comes to an end, she can’t go with him like she used to for Christmas and other special occasions.

She longs for the comforts of home, her children and grandchildren. He longs for her and even for their conjugal births.

“We were still fighting,” he said. “I miss that.”

When night fell, there was only one activity left: a game of bunco.

Before the pandemic, gambling had become a tradition after dinner: at around 7 a.m., residents gathered to roll the dice and socialize. “We’d have a snack, ice cream or something, and go to bed happy,” said Zita Husick, 95, who helped recruit players for the squad.

For almost a year they couldn’t play – the close quarters and the mix were deemed too risky. By the time they were allowed to start over, some members had become too sick to join. Others were dead.

Those who remained gathered in a circle around a table.

There was Ms. Leech, who acted as a marker and brought her cheese puffs to share with the group.

There was Mrs. Husick, who entertained with cheeky stories and returned to her gambling days with a chorus of “rolling”.

There was Peggy Foster, 82, an Afghan on his shoulders, Ralph Lucas, 84, the only man in the group, and Jean Rose, 96, who kept amazed himself with the success of his rolls.

Around and around they went, slamming and throwing the dice. “We’re a little rusty,” Ms. Husick said. The game lasted over an hour, until finally, with the clicking of the dice, there were cries of “bunco”.

“Okay girls, it was really nice playing for a change,” said Ms Leech, signaling the end of what had been one of their busiest days in a long time.

One by one, they said goodbye and left, in the elevator, back to their rooms.

Reporting was contributed by Danielle Ivory, Lauryn Higgins, Natasha Rodriguez, John yoon and Benjamin Guggenheim.

Travel News

‘A big relief’ for a woman finally free from gorilla glue in her hair

The past few weeks have been a roller coaster ride for Tessica Brown, Louisiana who used Gorilla Glue instead of hairspray one January day.

She rose to internet fame last week after posting a video on TikTok in which she called the decision to use the adhesive spray a “bad, bad, bad idea.” Over 30 million people have seen it and countless more on Instagram and Twitter. They demanded updates and flooded his posts with words of encouragement (and criticism), all while racking up suggestions on how to help. But nothing worked.

Finally, more than a month after her accident, Ms Brown had the glue removed from her hair, thanks to a Los Angeles plastic surgeon who spent hours on Wednesday using a homemade solvent to do the job.

“It has gone from scary to terrifying to torture,” Ms. Brown, 40, said in an interview Thursday. “And at this point, a great relief.”

Ms Brown, who runs a daycare and dance team, the Dazzling Divaz, in Violet, Louisiana, said if she could go back to the day it all began, she would have worn a hat instead.

As she rushed to get ready about a month ago, Ms Brown realized she no longer had her usual hairspray, Got2b Glued. While scrambling, she spotted a bottle of Gorilla Spray Adhesive, a permanent spray made by Gorilla Glue. She thought that by the time she got home that night, she would be able to wash it off. A month later, it hadn’t changed.

Desperate, she took to social media “to see if anyone could tell me what I can use to get rid of this,” she says.

Skin and hair experts stepped in and celebrities expressed sympathy. Neal Farinah, a well-known hairstylist whose client list includes Beyoncé, has offered to help her with scalp care or with a wig. Ms. Brown tried several of the recommended treatments – oils, acetone, apple cider vinegar – but nothing worked. As the days passed, she said, it was as if her ponytail got tighter and tighter: like “red ants were dancing on my head.”

On Saturday, she went to the emergency room, where nurses started acetone treatment, Ms. Brown said.

“It was burning to the point that my heart was beating too fast, so we had to keep stopping,” she said. A nurse told her that the procedure would probably take 20 hours, so she asked to continue treatment at home with the help of her mother and sisters.

But they had made little progress when she heard from Dr Michael Obeng, a plastic surgeon in Los Angeles, who offered to remove the glue from his head for free. He performed the procedure on Wednesday while she was under light anesthesia. Then she was able to comb her hair with her fingers.

“Dr. Obeng got it all, ”she said, adding that he was going to give her a few more scalp treatments to prevent her hair from falling out, she said.

Dr Obeng declined to speak through his publicist on Thursday, citing an exclusive interview he promised to an undisclosed outlet.

In an interview with TMZ on Wednesday after the operation, Dr Obeng said he created a solvent to dissolve polyurethane, the main active ingredient in Gorilla Glue, which is made up of medical grade adhesive remover, aloe vera, olive oil and a little acetone. He tested the concoction on a skull fitted with real hair and extensions that he tangled with Gorilla Spray Adhesive.

“I have a background in chemistry, so I knew that any compound can be broken down,” Dr Obeng said in the video. He said the surgery “went well” and Ms Brown was lucky that she had not suffered serious scalp injuries other than irritation from the chemical treatments she had used.

“She’s been through a lot and I hope you learn from Tessica’s injuries,” he said.

A spokesperson for Gorilla Glue said the company was happy Ms Brown was able to receive treatment and “we hope she’s doing well.” The spokeswoman declined to comment on whether Ms Brown’s experience had led to a discussion of whether to add hair to the list of unsuitable places to use Gorilla Glue Adhesive Spray on the product label .

Ms Brown said reports that she was planning to sue Gorilla Glue was false.

She said she learned from her hair accident, as well as her instant fame.

“Never use Gorilla Glue in your hair, for example,” she says. “If you don’t have the right product you need, I think you’d be better off without it.”

Ms Brown said she was unprepared for the negative reactions she received and wondered why she posted on social media, especially after her children were ridiculed at school .

“But then, if I had never posted it, it would always be in my head,” she says. “I wouldn’t be where I am right now, so I’m glad I posted it.”

Travel News

Video: Biden to discuss pandemic relief package with Republicans

new video loaded: Biden to discuss pandemic relief package with Republicans



Biden to discuss pandemic relief package with Republicans

President Biden will meet with 10 Republican senators on Monday who have proposed a much smaller Covid-19 relief package. Jen Psaki, the White House press secretary, told reporters that Mr. Biden’s biggest concern is releasing a package that’s too small.

The president made it clear long before he took office that he was open to engaging with Democrats and Republicans in Congress about their ideas. And this is an example of doing just that. So, as we said in our statement last night, this is an exchange of ideas, an opportunity to do so. This group has obviously sent out a letter with an overview, some outline of their concerns and priorities, and they are happy to have a conversation with them. It is not this meeting, it is a forum where the president can make or accept an offer. His opinion – it remains – what was stated in the press release last night, but also what he said on Friday, is that the risk is not that it is too big, this package, the risk is that it is too small. And that remains his opinion, and it is one that he will certainly express today. But it is important for him that he hears this group on their concerns, on their ideas. He is always ready to make this package stronger. And he too, as we noted in our statement last night, remains in close contact with President Pelosi and Chief Schumer, and he will continue that engagement throughout the day and in the days to come.

Recent episodes of United States and politics


Travel News

Effort to include $ 15 minimum wage in relief bill poses test for Democrats

Other lawmakers, including some Republicans, have argued that the pandemic relief program should be cut, with things like the minimum wage provision left for another legislative battle later in the year. Most Republicans in the House voted against a stand-alone minimum wage law in 2019, highlighting a Congressional Budget Office report that estimated the provision would put 1.3 million Americans out of work. The Republicans of the Senate, in charge of the chamber, did not take it back.

“This is an agenda item for the administration, too bad,” Senator Lisa Murkowski, Republican of Alaska, told reporters. “Should it be included as part of a Covid relief program? I think that distracts attention from the priority, which is the immediate need today. “

“Hey,” she added, “you get the car keys now. And so let’s get to the legislation, but you don’t need to think that you have to put it all together in one package. “

Republican Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina bluntly told reporters in January that “we’re not going to pay a minimum wage of $ 15 into it” and that Mr. Biden had better reach out to Capitol Hill and to negotiate a compromise.

Mr Sanders and Democrats argued that with unemployment benefits slated to start expiring in mid-March, there was little time to convince their Republican counterparts, who embarked on similar reconciliation efforts in 2017 to repeal parts of the Affordable Care Act and pass a sweeping tax review.

But to secure the first federal minimum wage hike since 2009, even with reconciliation, Mr. Sanders and the Liberal Democrats can afford to lose little or no support from the rest of the caucus.

Several lawmakers, including Representative John Yarmuth of Kentucky, chairman of the House Budget Committee, have expressed skepticism that the minimum wage provision can prevail thanks to the rules of the reconciliation process, which imposes strict parameters for prevent the process from being abused. Under the so-called Byrd rule, Democrats cannot include any measure that affects the Social Security program, increases the deficit after a certain period of time set in the budget resolution, or does not change income or spending.

Travel News

Ten GOP senators outline a bipartisan relief bill in a letter to Biden.

Ten Republican senators wrote to President Biden on Sunday, outlining a framework for the coronavirus relief legislation and urging Mr. Biden to compromise. The letter came as Democrats prepared to bypass the need for Republican support in order to deliver a broad relief program.

The 10 Senators, led by Susan Collins of Maine, have proposed a framework that includes some of the provisions of Mr. Biden’s $ 1.9 trillion plan, but would restrict others. It would include $ 160 billion for vaccine distribution and development, Covid testing and production of personal protective equipment, as well as relief for schools, small businesses and “more targeted assistance” for individuals through to another round of direct payments and unemployment benefits.

“Our proposal reflects many of your stated priorities, and with your support, we believe this plan could be approved quickly by Congress with bipartisan support,” the senators wrote.

The group, which also includes Mitt Romney of Utah, Michael Rounds of South Dakota, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia, are expected to release additional details on their proposal on Monday.

To get a package through the regular legislative process, Mr Biden would need 60 votes in the Senate, and therefore the support of at least 10 Republicans.

Mr Biden and the Main Democrats have said they want Republicans’ support for a new relief bill. But with several Republicans already hesitant to pass a broad package, Democrats are preparing to pass a bill on their own using budget reconciliation, a more complicated legislative process but one that only requires a simple Senate majority.

Travel News

Video: Benefits of acting now on relief ‘far outweigh the costs’, says Yellen

new video loaded: Benefits of acting on relief now ‘far outweigh the costs’, says Yellen



Benefits of acting on relief now ‘far outweigh the costs’, says Yellen

Speaking alongside President Biden, Treasury Secretary Janet L. Yellen pushed for swift action on relief coronavirus legislation to combat the economic impacts of the pandemic.

“Millions of people are out of work, out of work. The future of millions of people is held up for no good reason other than our inability to act. The choice could not therefore be clearer. We have learned from past crises that risk doesn’t matter. The risk does not do enough. And now is the time to act. I’ve asked Secretary Yellen, who has led this effort, to step in, and we’ll get into the details between us. But I think she also has a statement to make. “Thank you for this privilege, Mr. President. Well, there is huge pain in our economy right now, and it was evident in the data released yesterday. Over a million people applied for unemployment insurance last week, and that’s way more than during the worst week of the Great Recession. And economists agree that if there isn’t more help, many more people will lose their small businesses, the roofs over their heads, and the ability to feed their families. And we must help these people before the virus is brought under control. The president’s US bailout will help millions get to the other side of this pandemic. And it will also make smart investments to get our economy back on track. I want to stress that the chairman is absolutely right. The cost of doing nothing is much higher than the cost of doing something and doing something great. We must act now. And the benefits of acting now, and of acting big, will far outweigh the costs in the long run. “

Recent episodes of United States and politics


Travel News

How Biden could use reconciliation to speed up his pandemic relief plan

The name of the rule lends itself to a number of bird-related puns commonly used to describe the stages of the reconciliation process. There is the “Byrd Bath,” where the Senate parliamentarian cleans up and analyzes a bill for any provision that breaks the rule if a senator raises a concern about a violation. Anything that does not survive the exam is known as “Byrd drop” and is removed from the legislation before it can move forward.

In the case of Mr. Biden’s stimulus package, one of the thorniest questions is whether a provision to raise the federal minimum wage to $ 15 could survive the Byrd Bath. Rep. John Yarmuth, Democrat of Kentucky and chairman of the House Budget Committee, said in an interview that such a provision “is just an exaggeration.” His Senate counterpart Bernie Sanders, independent from Vermont, said he believed it was doable.

G. William Hoagland, a former senior Republican Senate budget official, said Democrats might find it difficult to use reconciliation to raise salaries or to fund the reopening of schools. But he suggested Democrats might try to push the boundaries, for example, arguing that raising the minimum wage nationwide could lead to increased tax revenues.

Vice President Kamala Harris could also cancel the parliamentarian, but that has not been done since 1975.

“At the end of the day, they can do a lot, but they can’t do a lot,” said Mr. Hoagland, senior vice president of the Bipartisan Policy Center. “That’s why I think President Biden would rather not go down that route and instead craft an emergency supplemental appropriation bill.”

A budget resolution could be presented early next week to kick off the reconciliation process, but it’s unclear how fast Democrats could move forward with the process given the legislative parameters and time constraints of another trial. of impeachment.

The timing is crucial as the pandemic continues to rage and existing relief programs run their course. Congress faces a deadline of March 14, when the current round of unemployment benefits begins to expire. In order to give states time to put in place a new round of aid and prevent the unemployed from losing access to their benefits, most analysts believe the legislation must be passed before the end of February. .