Travel News

Super Bowl means snacking, even without parties

Last year, the restaurant chain sold more than 11 million wings on Super Bowl Sunday. This year, Mr Tick said, he expects to meet or exceed that number, even with his 1,200 restaurants across the country facing various dining restrictions.

“We would expect to see a similar total demand, but an increase in offsite orders and, if I was a bettor, more smaller sized games, so a smaller order as well,” he said.

For millions of people, football fans or not, the Super Bowl has long been an excuse to gather in a bar, restaurant, or someone’s living room to party, eat food that is not healthy. from a distance, throw beer or cocktails and laugh at commercials. Some even pay attention to the game.

“It’s someone’s job to bring the wings,” said Krista Millard, a self-proclaimed football fanatic who is an office manager at an architectural firm in Pittsboro, NC. “Someone else is bringing the beer. Someone is bringing the children’s food. Someone is grilling. There’s a barbecue in North Carolina, sure, and a lot of people hang out, but in reality only four or five of us actually watch the game.

The pandemic has changed this ritual. David Jenkins, a pastor from Los Angeles who goes by DJ, listens to the advice of medical professionals this year. The watch party he has attended in recent years, which typically attracts 50 people, has been canceled. Instead, he’ll watch the game from his sofa, along with his wife, 6-year-old son and 11-year-old daughter.

“We’ll make some kind of Velveeta cheese dip – crazy food that I don’t normally have – and then I’ll balance it with celery sticks,” he says.

Los Angeles City Council member Mark Ridley-Thomas planned to order his food well in advance. For the past five years, he has hosted a Super Bowl Viewing Party for about 300 people as a fundraiser for the homeless and emancipated foster children. This year, he’ll be watching the game from his living room sofa and ordering wings from Hotville Chicken.

Travel News

What Georgia Means for the Markets.

With the two Democratic candidates leading in Georgia, the Nasdaq Composite Index on Wednesday opened about 1% lower on expectations that tech companies could be affected by higher corporate taxes and tighter antitrust control.

Wall Street investors see Democratic control of the Senate as leading to a large spending deficit early in the Biden administration, a potential boon to the still struggling US economy.

“We should expect fiscal policy to be looser than if Republicans had retained their majority,” Pantheon Macroeconomics’ Ian Shepherdson wrote in a research note. That could mean higher inflation, he added, which could explain why US Treasury bonds also came under selling pressure on Wednesday. The yield on 10-year Treasury bills climbed above 1% for the first time since March.

The effect on equities is more mixed, with diversified indices like the Dow Jones Industrial Average and the S&P 500 stagnating or rising as the highly technological Nasdaq sank. Firms whose fortunes are closely tied to the overall economy would benefit from a stimulus and higher infrastructure spending. Efforts to speed up vaccination programs would also help industries that rely on in-person interactions get back to business.

Goldman Sachs analysts also predicted “bigger changes in fiscal policy” in a Democratic Congress, focused primarily on stimulus, but ultimately followed by “a limited amount of tax increases.”

Travel News

The nation has reached the “safe harbor”. Here is what it means.

Joseph R. Biden Jr. has already won the presidential election, but on Tuesday he moved closer to the White House.

At the end of the day, the country was on the verge of reaching the so-called Safe Harbor deadline, which is widely accepted as the date on which all state-level electoral challenges – such as recounts and audits – are supposed to be completed.

Basically, that means President Trump’s efforts to overthrow the presidential election are nearing the end of the line. After Tuesday, state courts are most likely expected to dismiss any new lawsuits challenging the election.

This is because the results of the elections which were certified by the states are now considered conclusive and by law the votes of the electoral college of those states must be counted by Congress. As of Monday night, all states except Hawaii had certified their results and Mr. Biden had garnered more than the 270 electoral votes needed to become president.

The Safe Harbor deadline would normally pass without too much notice, but it looks particularly notable this year as Mr. Trump and his allies attempt to reverse the electoral process. Here are some more questions and answers about the deadline:

A relatively obscure passage from the Electoral Counts Act of 1887 says that if there are disputes in a state over the results of an election, but the results are settled “at least six days before the time set for the voters’ meeting ”, these results are conclusive and must be counted by Congress.

This is called the Safe Harbor deadline. Federal law states that the electoral college must vote on the Monday following the second Wednesday in December – this year, December 14. The Safe Harbor deadline falls six days before that, December 8.

It basically acts as a guarantee that Congress must count the votes of the Electoral College of states that have certified their elections and signed off on a voters list.

In states that have certified their results, the delay should also help guard against further legal challenges in state courts.

“It plays into the litigation because the courts are aware of this deadline and want to give this advantage to the states, so they are doing their best to try to comply,” said Richard L. Hasen, electoral law expert. at the University of California, Irvine.

The deadline is traditionally considered to have been met when a state certifies its votes.

Certification processes vary from state to state, but all require the governor to compile the certified results and send them to Congress, along with the names of the state Electoral College delegates.

President Trump has urged Republican-controlled legislatures in key states to step in and choose their own voters lists, but he has been pushed back at every turn. In the unlikely event that a state legislature attempts to appoint a separate group of voters, the United States House and Senate should agree to accept those electoral votes when Congress meets to count the votes on the day. January 6.

Not really. But their chances of success are still growing. The Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected a request by Republicans in Pennsylvania to overturn the state’s election results.

At present, there are only a few unsolved state-level lawsuits, including some in Georgia, Arizona, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania.

An open question is whether federal prosecutions can continue past the Safe Harbor deadline, even though it is likely that they can and will. Even so, there are only three federal lawsuits left – two in Wisconsin and one in Arizona – and they will almost certainly end soon.

Either way, the Trump campaign and his allies have failed to show that they would be deterred from filing more election-related lawsuits, even though they have lost nearly 50 cases.

The majority of the Supreme Court in Bush v. Gore, the 5-4 decision in 2000 that handed the presidency to George W. Bush, cited the safe harbor arrangement as a reason to act quickly to conclude the election.

Lawyers for the Trump campaign on Tuesday downplayed the importance of the deadline in a press release, saying “it is not unprecedented for election contests to last well beyond December 8.”

“Justice Ginsburg recognized in Bush v. Gore that the date of ‘ultimate service’ is January 6, when Congress counts and certifies Electoral College votes, ”the statement said. “The only fixed day in the US Constitution is the inauguration of the President on January 20 at noon.”

But Judge Ruth Bader Ginsburg disagreed in Bush v. Gore.

Adam Liptak contributed reporting.

Travel News

Biden’s victory means demotion for Netanyahu and less focus on Israel

More immediately, analysts and officials said, Israel will feel the transition to a Biden administration as a distraction from the conflict with the Palestinians. With a pandemic, a battered economy and deep societal cracks demanding his attention, Mr Biden, as he looks abroad, is expected to put more emphasis on tensions with China and Russia, climate change and repairing the frayed transatlantic alliance.

The questions concerning Iran are, however, very important. Mr. Biden spoke of showing Tehran a “way back to diplomacy” by offering to return to the Obama administration’s nuclear deal if Iran returns to strict compliance. Mr. Netanyahu cruised against the deal and applauded Mr. Trump’s withdrawal.

Contrary to Mr. Trump’s favoritism towards Israel, Mr. Biden has promised a return to a more balanced approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

It could mean, analysts and former officials say, that if Arab states like Morocco, Oman or Saudi Arabia express willingness to normalize their relations with Israel, a Biden administration could encourage them to insist on Israeli concessions. to the Palestinians in return.

Yet Mr. Biden has few illusions, his advisers say, that a settlement is achievable with Mr. Netanyahu and Mahmoud Abbas, the long-serving Palestinian president still in office.

Instead, the new administration should exert a calming influence. This could mean reopening the US consulate in Jerusalem, which Mr. Trump dissolved, as a quasi-embassy for the Palestinians; reopen a Palestinian diplomatic mission in Washington and restore US funding for hospitals in East Jerusalem, aid projects in the West Bank and Palestinian refugees.